翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ HMS Repulse (1916)
・ HMS Repulse (S23)
・ HMS Research
・ HMS Research (1863)
・ HMS Reserve (1650)
・ HMS Quail (1806)
・ HMS Quail (1895)
・ HMS Quail (G45)
・ HMS Quality (G62)
・ HMS Quantock (L58)
・ HMS Quebec
・ HMS Quebec (1781)
・ HMS Queen
・ HMS Queen (1769)
・ HMS Queen (1839)
HMS Queen (1902)
・ HMS Queen (D19)
・ HMS Queen Charlotte
・ HMS Queen Charlotte (1790)
・ HMS Queen Charlotte (1810)
・ HMS Queen Elizabeth
・ HMS Queen Elizabeth (1913)
・ HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08)
・ HMS Queen Emma
・ HMS Queen Mary
・ HMS Queenborough
・ HMS Quentin (G78)
・ HMS Quilliam (G09)
・ HMS Quorn
・ HMS Quorn (L66)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

HMS Queen (1902) : ウィキペディア英語版
HMS Queen (1902)

HMS ''Queen'' was a ''London'' or ''Queen'' class battleship commissioned in 1904, a sub-class of the ''Formidable'' class battleships of the British Royal Navy. It was the tenth Royal Navy ship to bear the name.
==Construction and design==
HMS ''Queen'' was laid down at Devonport Dockyard on 12 March 1901. Lady Charles Scott (wife of Admiral Lord Charles Scott), Lady Ernestine Edgcumbe, Mrs. Jackson (wife of Rear-Admiral T. S. Jackson), and Mrs. Champness (wife of Chief Constructor of Devonport Dockyard H. B. Champness) took part in the ceremony
She was launched and named by Queen Alexandra on 8 March 1902, in the presence of King Edward VII. It was the first major public event attended by the couple since the end of the mourning period after his accession the previous year. She was completed in March 1904.〔Burt, pp. 218, 227〕
The ''Formidable''s were similar in appearance to and had the same armament as the ''Majestic'' and ''Canopus'' classes that preceded them. The ''Formidables'' are often described as improved ''Majestic''s, but in design they really were enlarged ''Canopus''es; while the ''Canopus'' class took advantage of the greater strength of the Krupp armour employed in their construction to allow the ships to remain the same size as the ''Majestic''s with increased tonnage devoted higher speed and less to armour without sacrificing protection, in the ''Formidable''s Krupp armour was used to improve protection without reducing the size of the ships.〔''Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905'', p. 36〕 The ''Formidable''s thus were larger than the two preceding classes, and enjoyed both greater protection than the ''Majestic''s and the higher speed of the ''Canopus'' class. The ''Formidable''s armour scheme was similar to that of the ''Canopus''es, although, unlike in the ''Canopus''es, the armour belt ran all the way to the stern; it was long, deep and thick, tapering at the stem to thick and deep and at the stern to thick and deep. The main battery turrets had Krupp armour, on their sides and on their backs.〔
The ''Formidable''s improved on the main and secondary armament of previous classes, being upgunned from 35-calibre to 40-calibre long guns and from 40-calibre to 45-calibre long guns. The guns could be loaded at any bearing and elevation, and beneath the turrets the ships had a split hoist with a working chamber beneath the guns that reduced the chance of a cordite fire spreading from the turret to the shell and powder handling rooms and to the magazines.〔
The ''Formidable''s had an improved hull form that made them handier at high speeds than the ''Majestic''s. They also had inward-turning propellers, which allowed reduced fuel consumption and slightly higher speeds than in previous classes but at the expense of less manoeuvrability at low speeds.〔
After the first three, there was a change in design for the last five ships, starting with ; as a result they are often considered to constitute the ''London'' class,〔For example, ''Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905'', p. 37, and Burt, pp. 175–194, refer to the ''London''s as a separate class while Gibbons, p. 151, lists them all as part of the ''Formidable'' class. Burt refers to the ''London''s as the ''Bulwark'' class.〕 but also can be viewed as in effect a sub-class of the ''Formidable'' class. The main difference in the ''London''s was thinner deck armour and some other detail changes to the armour scheme, and the consequent lower displacement.〔''Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905'', p. 37〕
''Queen'' and her sister ship were the last two ''London''-class ships built. They were identical to the first three ''London''s except that they had open 12-pounder gun batteries mounted in the open on the upper deck amidships, had a lower displacement, and had a few minor details of their design changed.〔 ''Queen'' and ''Prince of Wales'' were laid down after the ''Duncan'' class battleships that succeeded the ''Formidable''s and ''London''s to create with their six sisters a tactical group of eight ships, and were completed after the ''Duncan''s as well. They generally are considered part of the ''Formidable''〔Gibbons, p. 151〕 or ''London'' class,〔 but the difference in the mounting of their 12-pounder guns, their lower displacement, and their later construction than the ''Duncan''s lead some authors to viewed them as constituting a ''Queen'' class separate from the ''Formidable'' and ''London'' classes.〔Burt, pp. 215–228〕
Due to service problems with the water tube Belleville boilers the original plans were changed during construction, and HMS ''Queen'' was fitted with Babcock and Wilcox cylindrical boilers instead. Her nearly identical sister ship ''Prince of Wales'' was fitted with the problematic water tube Belleville boilers.
''Queen'' and ''Prince of Wales'' were the last battleships for which Sir William Henry White had sole design responsibility. Like all predreadnoughts, they were outclassed by the dreadnought battleships that began to appear in 1906, although they took on some front-line duties early in World War I.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「HMS Queen (1902)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.